Quick Links
Solid Waste Financial Responsibility
To minimize the threat to public health and the environment,
owners and operators of permitted solid waste facilities operating in the State
of Arkansas are required to provide financial assurance for closure, post-closure
care and corrective action.
The owners and operators must develop and maintain a detailed written estimate,
in current dollars, of the cost of hiring a third party to close the largest area
of all permitted facilities ever requiring a final cover and to conduct post-closure
care for the permitted facility in compliance with the post-closure plan. Cost estimates
must be reviewed, approved, and updated annually by completing a new cost estimate
with the Annual Engineering Inspection Report. The financial assurance instruments
must then be updated to cover the new cost estimates, and both the cost estimate
and adjusted instruments submitted to ADEQ.
In addition, facilities required to perform corrective action may be required
to post the same sort of financial assurance for any required cleanup as a condition
of a permit, remedial action plan, enforcement order, or a voluntary cleanup agreement
with ADEQ.
As provided in Regulation 22, Chapter 14, the mechanisms used to demonstrate
financial assurance under this Chapter must ensure that the funds necessary to meet
the costs of closure, post-closure care, and corrective action for known releases
will be available whenever they are needed. Owners and operators must choose from
the options specified in paragraphs (a) through (j) of this chapter. Financial assurance
required by this chapter should be filed on forms developed and provided by the
department.
Financial Assurance Mechanisms Available to Owners and Operators
ADEQ accepts the following financial instruments to demonstrate financial assurance
for closure, post-closure, and/or corrective action.
1. Trust Fund – A trust fund is an agreement between three parties
wherein the owner or operator of a facility (the Grantor) sets aside a specific
amount of cash or funds, which are held in trust by a third party (the Trustee)
for the purpose of paying closure and post-closure expenses. ADEQ is the beneficiary
of the trust. In the event of closure, ADEQ uses the funds in the trust to hire
a third party to perform closure and post-closure, and to perform post-closure
monitoring and maintenance.
What is required, at a minimum:
- The Trustee must be qualified and authorized to act as a trustee. Its trust operations must be regulated and examined by a federal or state agency.
- The text of the trust agreement must be filed on forms developed by ADEQ and provided to the Director for approval.
- The owner/operator must provide ADEQ with an originally signed copy of the trust agreement to the Director for approval.
2. Surety Bond Guaranteeing Payment or Performance – A surety bond
is a contract between two parties to benefit a third party. One party (the Surety)
guarantees that the obligations of the second party (the Principal) will be
met. For purposes of financial assurance, the owner/operator of a permitted
solid waste management facility is the Principal. Through a surety bond, the
Surety guarantees to ADEQ that it will meet the permitted facility’s closure
and/or post-closure obligations if the owner or operator is unable to do so.
There are two types of surety bonds:
a. Performance bonds – the surety guarantees that it will either
perform the closure/post-closure activity in accordance with the approved
closure plan on behalf of the permitted facility; or pay out the face value
of the bond into a standby trust fund.
b. Payment bonds – the
surety guarantees that it will pay out the face value of the bond into a
standby trust fund in the event that the owner/operator fails to perform
as required by the approved closure plan.
What is required, at a minimum:
- The surety must be listed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury on its Circular 570. The Circular can be accessed at: http://fms.treas.gov/c570/index.html.
- The text of the surety bond must be filed on forms developed by ADEQ and provided to the Director for approval.
- A standby trust fund must be established with a qualified financial institution according to the requirements for trust funds stipulated in Reg.22.1405 (a).
- The penal sum of the bond must be equal to the current closure, post-closure care or corrective action cost estimate.
- The owner/operator must provide the Regulator with the surety bond and an originally signed copy of the standby trust agreement.
3. Letter of Credit – a letter of credit is a document issued by a
financial institution that guarantees the payment of the permitted facility’s
obligations up to a stated amount for a specified period of time. The letter
of credit provides assurance to the Regulator that the permitted facility will
pay for closure and post-closure when necessary.
What is required, at a minimum:
- The issuing institution must be an entity which has the authority to issue letters of credit and whose letter-of-credit operations are regulated and examined by a Federal or State agency.
- A letter from the owner/operator referring to the letter of credit by number, issuing institution, and date, and providing the following: name and address of the facility, and the amount of funds assured.
- The letter of credit must be: 1) irrevocable; 2) issued for a period of at least one year in an amount at least equal to the current cost estimates for closure, post-closure care, or corrective action; 3) provide that the expiration date be automatically extended for a period of at least one year; and 4) contain a one hundred twenty (120) day cancellation notice by certified mail.
- The text of the letter of credit and the company letterhead must be filed on forms developed by ADEQ and provided to the Director for approval.
4. Insurance – an insurance policy is a contract between two parties.
One party (the insurer) agrees to pay, on behalf of the second party (the policyholder)
for claims made against the policyholder or policy. For purposes of financial
assurance, the owner/operator of a permitted solid waste management facility
is the policyholder.
What is required, at a minimum:
- The insurer must be licensed to transact the business of insurance, or eligible to provide insurance as an excess or surplus lines insurer, in the State of Arkansas.
- The owner/operator shall provide a certificate of insurance and the insurance policy to the Director for approval.
- The face amount of the policy must be at least equal to the current closure and/or post-closure cost estimates.
- The insurance policy must:
- Guarantee funds will be available to close the permitted facility whenever final closure occurs or to provide post-closure care for the permitted facility whenever the post-closure care period begins.
- Contains a provision that allows the policy to be assigned to a successor owner or operator.
- Stipulate that the insurer may not cancel, terminate or fail to renew the policy except for failure to pay the premium.
- Be automatically renewable at no less than the face amount of the expiring policy.
- Guarantee that once closure or post-closure care begins, the insurer will be responsible for paying out funds to the owner or operator, up to an amount equal to the face amount of the policy.
5. Corporate Financial Test – the financial test is a form of self-insurance
where the owner or operator is not required to arrange with a third party or
set aside cash funds for closure, post-closure, or corrective action costs,
provided that the owner or operator can pass one of two financial strength tests.
When these costs need to be paid, the owner or operator is solely responsible
for paying them.
What is required, at a minimum:
- The facility must satisfy one of three financial component conditions in Reg.22.1405 (e)(1)(i).
- The tangible net worth of the facility must be greater than what is specified in Reg.22.1405 (e)(1)(ii).
- The facility must have assets in the United States amounting to at least equal to the sum of current closure, post-closure care, or corrective action cost estimates.
- The facility’s financial statements must be audited by an independent Certified Public Accountant (CPA).
- The facility must submit the following items to the Director for approval:
- An original letter signed by the facility’s chief financial officer that lists all the current costs estimates for all covered facilities. Wording of the letter must be filed on forms developed by ADEQ.
- A copy of the CPA’s audit report of the facility’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year.
- A copy of the CPA’s unqualified opinion of the owner’s or operator’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year.
- A report from the CPA stipulating no discrepancies between the CFO’s letter and the audited financial statements.
6. Local Government Financial Test – a local government can also self-insure
by demonstrating their financial strength, provided the local government can
pass one of two financial strength tests. This demonstration can be achieved
by showing that it has issued general obligation bonds for which they received
investment grade ratings. Alternatively, the local government can pass ratios
that address their cash holdings and debt obligations relative to the size of
their budget.
What is required, at a minimum:
- The local government must satisfy one of two financial component conditions in Regulation 22.1405 (f).
- The local government must prepare its financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for governments and be audited by an independent certified public accountant or appropriate State agency.
- Cannot be currently in default on any outstanding general obligation bond or have any outstanding general obligation bonds rated lower than Baa as issued by Moody’s or BBB as issued by Standard and Poors.
- Cannot have operated at a deficit equal to five percent (5%) or more of total annual revenue in each of the past two fiscal years.
- Cannot have received an adverse opinion, disclaimer of opinion, or other qualified opinion from the independent certified public accountant or appropriate State agency.
- Local governments must report annually on whether they continue to meet the conditions of the test and inform the public that they are using the test.
- The local government must submit the following items to the Director for approval:
- An original letter signed by the government’s chief financial officer that lists all the current costs estimates covered by a financial test; provides evidence and certifies that the local government meets the conditions of Reg.22.1405 (f)(1)(i), (f)(1)(ii), and (f)(1)(iii); and certifies that the local government meets the conditions of Reg.22.1405 (f)(2). Wording of the letter must be filed on forms developed by ADEQ.
- The local governments independently audited year-end financial statements for the latest fiscal year.
- A report to the local government from the local government’s independent certified public accountant or appropriate State agency based on performing agreed upon procedures relative to the financial ratios required by Reg.22.1405 (f)(1)(i)(B) and the requirements of Reg.22.1405 (f)(1)(ii) and Reg.22.1405 (f)(1)(iii)(C) and (D).
- A copy of the comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR) used to comply with Reg.22.1405 (f)(2).
7. Corporate Guarantee – a corporate guarantee is a form of the Financial
Test in which a third party (either the direct or higher-tier parent corporation
of the owner/operator, a firm whose parent corporation is also the parent corporation
of the owner/operator, or a firm with a “substantial business relationship”
with the owner/operator) “stands in the shoes” of the owner/operator in providing
a guarantee that costs of closure, post-closure care, or corrective action will
be paid in the event that the owner/operator is unable to do so. The third party
(the Guarantor) must be able to pass the Corporate Financial Test.
What is required, at a minimum:
- The Guarantor must meet or exceed the standards of the Corporate Financial Test and provide documentation of all items required by Reg.22.1405 (e)(2).
- Provide a signed, certified copy of a written guarantee between the Guarantor and the owner/operator.
- Provide a letter from the Guarantor’s Chief Financial Officer detailing the value received by the Guarantor from the owner/operator for the guarantee.
- The Guarantor must document that it continues to meet the conditions of the Corporate Financial Test each fiscal year that the guarantee remains in effect.
8. Local Government Guarantee – a local government may guarantee the
costs of closure, post-closure and corrective action by another local government
or by a private business. The local government or private business guarantor
would promise to take responsibility for the obligations of the local government
owner or operator if the owner or operator fails to do so and provide proof
that it passes the financial test requirements.
What is required, at a minimum:
- The local government guarantor must satisfy all the requirements of Regulation 22.1405 (f)(1) and (2) and provide all documentation required in Reg.22.1405 (f) (3).
- The local government guarantor must comply with the terms of a written guarantee in Regulation 22.1405 (h) and place a certified copy of the guarantee along with the items required under Reg.22.1405 (f)(3) into the facility’s operating record.
- The local government guarantor must establish a fully funded trust fund as specified in Reg.22.1405 (a) in the name of the owner or operator.
9. State Approved Mechanism – an owner or operator may guarantee the
costs of closure, post-closure, and corrective action by obtaining any other
mechanism that meets the criteria specified in Reg.22.1405 (l) and is approved
by the Director.
What is required, at a minimum:
- The financial assurance mechanism must ensure that the amount of funds assured is sufficient to cover the costs of closure, post-closure care, and corrective action when needed.
- The financial assurance mechanism must ensure that funds will be available when needed.
- The financial assurance mechanism must be submitted to the Director for approval.
10. Municipality or County Contract of Obligation – a municipality
or county may guarantee the costs of closure and post-closure by executing a
contract of obligation with ADEQ. The contract of obligation is a binding and
enforceable agreement on the municipality or county which allows ADEQ to collect
the required amount from any funds being disbursed to or to be disbursed from
the State of Arkansas to the municipality or county.
What is required, at a minimum:
- The financial assurance mechanism must ensure that the amount of funds assured is sufficient to cover the costs of closure, post-closure care, and corrective action when needed.
- The maximum amount pledged under the contract cannot exceed the total amount of general revenue disbursed to the municipality or county in the last fiscal year, or, if approved by the Director, the amount currently projected by the State to be disbursed during the current fiscal year.
- The contract of obligation must be irrevocable and issued for a period of at least one year.
- The owner or operator shall file the contract of obligation on forms developed by ADEQ and provided to the Director for approval.
Rules And Related Laws
- Code of Federal Regulations
Title 40 - Protection of Environment
Chapter 1 - Environmental Protection Agency
Subchapter 1 - Solid Wastes
Part 258 - Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr
- Arkansas Code Anotated §8-6-1002 (e)(1)
Landfill Post-Closure Trust Fund
- Arkansas Code Anotated §8-6-1601 et. seq.
Financial Assurance
- Regulation 14 - Chapter 17
Regulations & Administrative Procedures for the Waste Tire Program
- Regulation 22 - Chapter 14
Solid Waste Management Rules
Reg.22.1405 – Allowable Mechanisms
As provided in 40 CFR 258.74 the mechanisms used to demonstrate financial assurance
must ensure that the funds necessary to meet the costs of closure, post-closure
care, and corrective action for known releases will be available whenever they are
needed. Owner and operators must choose from the options below. Financial assurance
required by Regulation, Chapter 14 should be filed on forms developed and provided
by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality.
All mechanisms used to satisfy financial assurance requirements must be submitted to the Director for approval
in their ORIGINAL form, with original signatures and notarized seals (if required).
The Department cannot accept e-mail versions, faxed versions, or instruments duplicated
by a copy machine.
Trust Fund
Reg.22.1405 (a)
Surety Bond Guaranteeing Payment or Performance:
Performance Bond and
Standby Trust Agreement ●
Payment Bond and
Standby Trust AgreementReg.22.1405 (b)
Letter of CreditReg.22.1405 (c)
InsuranceReg.22.1405 (d)
Corporate Financial TestReg.22.1405 (e)
Local Government Financial TestReg.22.1405 (f)*
*There is a formatting
error in the current version of Regulation 22. The current version lists the Local
Government Financial Test as Reg.22.1405 (e). The correct format for this section
is Reg.22.1405 (f).
There is a second formatting error located in Reg.22.1405 (f)(3)(i)(C). The correct
paragraph should read as follows, “A report to the local government from the local
government’s independent certified public accountant (CPA) or the appropriate State
agency based on performing an agreed upon procedures engagement relative to the
financial ratios required by Reg.22.1405 (f)(1)(i)(B), if applicable, and the requirements
of Reg.22.1405 (f)(1)(ii) and Reg.22.1405 (f)(1)(iii)(C) and (D) of this section. The CPA or State agency’s report should state the procedures
performed and the CPA or State agency’s findings.”
**Corporate Guarantee
Reg.22.1405 (g)
**Local Government Guarantee
Reg.22.1405 (h)
Municipality or County Contract of Obligation
Reg.22.1405 (n)
**Currently revising these instruments.
Solid Waste Facilities Requiring Financial Assurance
Financial Assurance Regulations apply
to owners and operators of all solid waste disposal or processing facilities, except
as specifically provided, including but not limited to the following permit
categories:
- Class 1 facilities - landfills built to RCRA Subtitle D standards, as incorporated herein for the acceptance of all nonhazardous wastes.
- Class 3 Non-Commercial (3N) - landfills that accept for disposal nonhazardous industrial and commercial wastes generated by the permittee and do not accept waste for disposal from any other source.
- Class 3 Commercial (3C) - landfills that accept for disposal only authorized nonhazardous industrial and commercial wastes generated by the permittee or from other approved facility locations or sources.
- Class 3 Tire (3T) - tire monofills that accept only processed tires or whole baled tires for disposal.
- Class 4 facilities - landfills for the commercial disposal of inert nonputrescible Class 4 wastes, as defined by Regulation 22.
- Composting Facilities (CY) - facilities that accept only vegetative grass, brush and tree yard wastes.
- Composting Facilities (CO) - facilities that accept type Y wastes and approved organic wastes.
- Composting Facilities (CS) - facilities that accept type Y wastes and approved solid wastes.
- Transfer Stations (TS) - facilities that manage the bulking of solid waste for transportation to a point of disposal.
- Solid Waste Recovery Facilities (WRF) - facilities that segregate, recover, otherwise process recyclable materials from Class 4 types of waste streams.
Annual Inflation Factors for Financial Assurance
A.C.A. § 8-6-1601 et seq. and Chapter
14 of APC&EC Regulation 22 requires all permitted solid waste management facilities
to post financial assurance for the costs of closure, post-closure care, and corrective
action (if applicable).
During the active life of the facility, the owner or operator
must adjust the closure, post-closure care, and corrective action cost estimates
for inflation, in accordance with Reg.22.1402 (a)(2), Reg.22.1403 (a)(2), and Reg.22.1404
(a)(1).
For owners and operators who use the corporate financial test or corporate guarantee,
the cost estimates must be updated for inflation within 90 days following the close
of the facilities’ fiscal year and before submission of updated information to ADEQ
as specified in Reg.22.1405 (e)(2)(iii) and Reg.22.1405 (g)(1).
For owners and operators who use the local government financial test or local
government guarantee, the cost estimates must be updated for inflation within 180
days following the close of the facilities’ fiscal year and before submission of
updated information to ADEQ as specified in Reg.22.1405 (f)(3)(ii) and Reg.22.1405
(g).
This adjustment may be made by recalculating the maximum costs of closure in
current dollars, or by using an inflation factor derived from the most recent Implicit
Price Deflator for Gross National Product published by the U.S. Department of Commerce
in its Survey of Current Business, as specified in paragraphs (b)(1)(2). The inflation
factor is the result of dividing the latest published annual Deflator by the Deflator
for the previous year. The previous year’s cost estimate is then multiplied by the
inflation factor to derive the new cost estimate to be assured for the next year.
The Implicit Price Deflator for the U.S. Gross National Product is published
annually on March 31. ADEQ then computes the annual inflation factor and provides
this information to each facility required to establish financial assurance for
closure, post-closure care, or corrective action.
For reference, the annual inflation factor for recent years is shown as follows:
IMPLICIT PRICE DEFLATOR
BASED ON U.S. GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT
(Updated March 31 of each year)
| Year |
Implicit Price Deflators |
(This Year/Last Year) |
Inflation Factor |
Multiplication Factor
|
| 1998 |
1997 IPD = 101.93 |
1996 IPD = 100 |
1.93% |
101.93%
|
| 1999 |
1998 IPD = 103.19 |
1997 IPD = 101.93 |
1.24% |
101.24%
|
| 2000 | 1999 IPD = 104.77 |
1998 IPD = 103.19 | 1.53% |
101.53%
|
| 2001 |
2000 IPD = 106.89 | 1999 IPD = 104.77 |
2.02% | 102.02%
|
| 2002 |
2001 IPD = 109.21 |
2000 IPD = 106.89 |
2.17% |
102.17%
|
| 2003 |
2002 IPD = 110.63 |
2001 IPD = 109.21 |
1.30% |
101.30%
|
| 2004 |
2003 IPD = 105.671 |
2002 IPD = 103.932 |
1.67% |
101.67%
|
| 2005 |
2004 IPD = 109.099 |
2003 IPD = 106.516 |
2.42% |
102.42%
|
| 2006 |
2005 IPD = 112.726 |
2004 IPD = 109.416 |
3.03% |
103.03%
|
| 2007 |
2006 IPD = 116.034 |
2005 IPD = 112.726 |
2.93% |
102.935%
|
| 2008 |
2007 IPD = 120.613 |
2006 IPD = 116.034 |
3.95% |
103.946%
|
| 2009 |
2008 IPD = 123.244 | 2007 IPD = 120.613 |
2.18% | 102.18%
|
| 12010 | 2009 IPD = 134.305 |
2008 IPD = 133.627 | 0.51% |
100.51%
|
| 2011 |
2010 IPD = 111.14 |
2009 IPD = 109.664 |
1.35% |
101.35%
|
|
1In 2009, the Bureau of Economic Analysis revised its indexing
and set the baseline index at 100 for the year 2005. Previous implicit price deflators
shown here (2008 through 2004) were based on a baseline index of 100 for the year
2000, (2003 and earlier) were based on a baseline index of 100 for the year 1996.
Information in this table is obtained from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
|
All Closure, Post-Closure, and Corrective Action cost estimates must be updated
annually, either by completing a new cost estimate, or by multiplying the previous
year’s cost estimate by the Inflation Factor. For example:
Sample Calculation
|
| Sum of Closure, Post-Closure and Corrective Action Cost Estimates for Last Year: |
$1,500,000.00
|
| Times the Inflation Factor for this year: |
X 1.0135
|
| Updated Cost Estimate for this year: |
$1,520,250
|
For Additional Information Contact:
Susan Speake, Programs Branch Manager
Office: (501)-682-0594
Fax: (501)-682-0611
Email:
speake@adeq.state.ar.us