What is Financial Assurance?
Nearly all companies operate with a finite physical life, eventually they
will need to close or cease operations. To protect human health and the environment
from the negative impacts of abandoned hazardous waste sites, the Federal and
State law require owners and operators of certain hazardous waste management
facilities to provide guarantees for the safe closure of these facilities, with
the specific intent to minimize the number of these sites that are abandoned
or “orphaned” by their owners or operators, and to ensure that the polluter
or responsible party bears the burden and costs of cleanup rather than the general
public. These requirements for financial responsibility additionally provide
an incentive for operators to locate, design, and operate their facilities in
a manner that will minimize closure and cleanup costs and reduce the likelihood
of accidents and other incidents that may harm third parties (e.g., their neighboring
facilities and members of the surrounding community).
State and Federal law require that the owners and operators of interim status
and permitted hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities set
aside funds or provide assurances that in the event of closure or bankruptcy,
funds are available to safely clean up and secure the hazardous waste management
facility and if wastes are left in place after the closure of the facility,
to provide monitoring and oversight of the facility for at least 30 years to
ensure that the clean up remains safe and effective. Additionally, facilities
where hazardous wastes or hazardous substances have been released to the environment
may be required to post the same sort of assurances for any required cleanup
as a condition of a RCRA permit, remedial action plan, RATFA or other enforcement
order, or a voluntary cleanup or elective site cleanup agreement with ADEQ.
The owner or operator of these facilities must develop a cost estimate for
carrying out all necessary activities to clean up and close their hazardous
waste operations, as well as for monitoring and oversight of the closed facility
for at least 30 years if the closure plan calls for any waste or other contamination
to remain in place. These costs must address the use of a third party to carry
out all closure and post-closure activity in the complete absence of the owner
or operator. Operators of active hazardous waste management facilities which
are subject to RCRA permitting or corrective action must additionally provide
for up to $2 million in liability coverage for damages to third parties for
sudden accidental occurrences, and if a land treatment or land disposal unit,
must provide up to an additional $6 million in coverage for non-sudden accidental
occurrences.
These cost estimates must be reviewed and updated annually, either by completing
a new cost estimate or by multiplying the previous year’s cost estimate by a
specified inflation factor. The financial instruments must then be updated to
cover the new cost estimates, and both the cost estimate and adjusted instruments
submitted to ADEQ.
ADEQ’s procedures for demonstrating financial assurance are set out in
Regulation No. 23, Section 264 Subsection H (for facilities holding a RCRA
permit) and in Section 265, Subsection H for facilities under RCRA interim status
and those parties not subject to a RCRA permit.
What Instruments are Acceptable to Demonstrate Financial Assurance?
ADEQ accepts any of six (6) types of financial instruments or documents to
demonstrate financial assurance for closure, post-closure, third party liability,
and/or corrective or remedial action costs:
- Trust Fund. A trust fund is an agreement between three parties
wherein the owner or operator of a facility (the Grantor) sets aside a specific
amount of cash or funds, which are held in trust by a third party (the Trustee)
for the purpose of paying closure and post-closure expenses. ADEQ is named
as the beneficiary of the trust. In the event of closure, ADEQ uses the
funds in the trust to hire a third party remedial contractor to carry out
cleanup and closure, and to perform post-closure monitoring and maintenance.
- Letter of Credit. A letter of credit (LOC) is a document issued
by a bank or other financial institution that guarantees the payment of
a customer’s obligation for up to a stated dollar amount for a specified
time. The owner or operator of the regulated facility arranges with a financial
institution to issue an LOC payable to ADEQ, assuring that the owner or
operator will pay for closure and post-closure costs when necessary. Essentially,
an LOC substitutes the bank’s credit for that of the owner or operator,
eliminating the financial risk to the State. An LOC must be accompanied
by a Stand-by Trust Agreement, which creates a trust into which ADEQ will
deposit the funds from the LOC in the event that it must cash in the LOC
in order to carry out the needed cleanup and closure should the owner or
operator be unable to do so.
- Surety Bond. Like an LOC, a surety bond is an agreement between
two parties. One party (the Surety) guarantees that the financial obligations
of the second party (the Principal) will be met. For purposes of financial
assurance, the owner or operator of the regulated facility is the Principal.
By means of the bond, the Surety guarantees to ADEQ that it will meet the
owner or operator’s closure and post-closure costs if the owner or operator
is unable to do so.
- Insurance. Facility owners and operators may wish to obtain an
insurance policy wherein one party (the Insurer) agrees to pay, on behalf
of a second party (the Policyholder) for claims made against the Policyholder
or the policy. For the purposes of financial assurance, the facility owner
or operator is the Policyholder. Through the policy, the Insurer agrees
to reimburse a party upon direction from ADEQ for costs incurred for closure
and post-closure care, for corrective action, and/or for damages incurred
by a third party due to sudden or non-sudden releases or other mishaps.
The insurer reimburses parties directly; and a standby trust agreement is
not required with this mechanism.
- ADEQ requires that the Insurer be licensed or recognized by the
Arkansas Insurance Department to either transact the business of insurance
or sell surplus or excess lines of insurance in the State of Arkansas;
- The Insurer must have a rating of AAA, AA, or A as rated by Standard &
Poor’s; Aaa, Aa, or A if rated by Moody’s, or A++, A+, A, or A- if rated
by A.M. Best.
- ADEQ does not accept captive insurance policies for the purpose
of providing financial assurance.
- The owner or operator, in addition to providing a Certificate of
Insurance, must provide ADEQ with a copy of the insurance policy, its
declaration page, and all endorsements or exclusions as part of its
submittal to demonstrate financial assurance.
- The policy must pay from the first dollar of loss; no deductibles,
retained limits, or self-insured retentions are allowed.
- Corporate Financial Test. The financial test is a form of self-insurance
where the owner or operator of a facility is not required to arrange with
a third party or set aside cash funds for closure, post-closure, corrective
action, or liability costs, provided that the owner or operator can pass
one of two financial strength tests. When these costs need to be paid, the
Owner or Operator are solely responsible for paying them. Only companies
with large net worth or assets relative to the costs to be assured are likely
to pass either of the two tests.
- The financial test may be used only to cover the entire cost estimate
for a facility; e.g., it must address the total sum of the owner or
operator’s environmental and other liabilities and cannot be used in
combination with any other financial assurance mechanism.
- The Owner or Operator must have audited year-end consolidated financial
statements for least one completed fiscal year’s operations under its
current corporate structure in order to qualify to use the financial
test. Newly-organized or spun-off companies with less than one full
year’s independent operations will likely not qualify; and may not combine
an extract of its financial operations under a previous corporate structure
as part of its submittal for financial assurance. These companies must
use a cash instrument or insurance policy, or they may be covered by
a parent corporation using the Corporate Guarantee.
- The Company’s financial statements must be audited by an independent
Certified Public Accountant (CPA)
- A copy of the consolidated financial statements must be submitted
along with the Chief Financial Officer’s letter, the independent CPA’s
audit report, and a special report from the CPA stipulating no discrepancies
between the CFO’s letter and the audited financial statements.
- Corporate Guarantee. A Corporate Guarantee is a form of the Financial
Test in which a third party – either the direct or higher-tier parent corporation
of the owner/operator, a firm whose parent corporation is also the parent
corporation of the owner/operator, or a firm with a “substantial business
relationship” with the owner/operator – “stands in the shoes” of the owner/operator
in providing a guarantee that costs of closure, post-closure care, corrective
action, and/or third party liability will be paid in the event that the
owner/operator is unable to do so. The third party (the Guarantor) must
be able to pass the Corporate Financial Test, and in addition to all documentation
required for the Financial Test must additionally provide a signed, certified
copy of a written guarantee between the Guarantor and the owner/operator,
and a letter from the Guarantor’s Chief Financial Officer detailing the
value received by the Guarantor from the owner/operator for the guarantee.
The Guarantor must document that it continues to meet the conditions of
the Corporate Financial Test each fiscal year that the guarantee remains
in effect.
Model Instruments and Frequently-Used Forms
Documents and instruments used to demonstrate financial assurances under
the provisions of Regulation No. 23 must be prepared in specific formats as
set forth in the Regulation. For ease of preparation, the following model instruments
are provided.
Annual Inflation Factors for Financial Assurance
Subsection H (Financial Assurance) to Sections 264 and 265 of APC&EC
Regulation No. 23 requires facilities
which hold a RCRA permit to establish financial assurance for the costs of carrying
out closure, post-closure, and corrective action (if applicable) at the facility.
During the active life of the facility, the owner or operator must adjust
the closure, post-closure, and corrective action cost estimates for inflation
within 60 days prior to the anniversary date of the establishment of the financial
instrument(s) used to comply with APC&EC Regulation No. 23, § 264.101(b),
264.143, 264.145, 265.143 and 265.145. For owners and operators who use the
financial test or corporate guarantee, the cost estimates must be updated for
inflation within 30 days after the close of the firm's fiscal year and before
submission of updated information to ADEQ as specified in ' 264.143 (f)(3),
and 265.143(e)(3).
This adjustment may be made by recalculating the maximum costs of closure
in current dollars, or by using an inflation factor derived from the most recent
Implicit Price Deflator for Gross National Product published by the U.S. Department
of Commerce in its Survey of Current Business, as specified in paragraphs (b)(1)
and (2) of this section. The inflation factor is the result of dividing the
latest published annual Deflator by the Deflator for the previous year. The
previous year’s cost estimate is then multiplied by the inflation factor to
derive the new cost estimate to be assured for the new year.
The Implicit Price Deflator for the U.S. Gross National Product is published
annually on March 31. ADEQ then computes the annual inflation factor and provides
this information to each facility required to establish financial assurance
for closure, post-closure, or clean-up work.
For reference, the annual inflation factor for recent years is shown as follows:
IMPLICIT PRICE DEFLATOR
BASED ON U.S. GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT
(Updated March 31 of each year)
| Year |
Implicit Price Deflators |
(This Year/Last Year) |
Inflation Factor |
Multiplication Factor
|
| 1998 |
1997 IPD = 101.93 |
1996 IPD = 100 |
1.93% |
101.93%
|
| 1999 |
1998 IPD = 103.19 |
1997 IPD = 101.93 |
1.24% |
101.24%
|
| 2000 | 1999 IPD = 104.77 |
1998 IPD = 103.19 | 1.53% |
101.53%
|
| 2001 |
2000 IPD = 106.89 | 1999 IPD = 104.77 |
2.02% | 102.02%
|
| 2002 |
2001 IPD = 109.21 |
2000 IPD = 106.89 |
2.17% |
102.17%
|
| 2003 |
2002 IPD = 110.63 |
2001 IPD = 109.21 |
1.30% |
101.30%
|
| 2004 |
2003 IPD = 105.671 |
2002 IPD = 103.932 |
1.67% |
101.67%
|
| 2005 |
2004 IPD = 109.099 |
2003 IPD = 106.516 |
2.42% |
102.42%
|
| 2006 |
2005 IPD = 112.726 |
2004 IPD = 109.416 |
3.03% |
103.03%
|
| 2007 |
2006 IPD = 116.034 |
2005 IPD = 112.726 |
2.93% |
102.935%
|
| 2008 |
2007 IPD = 120.613 |
2006 IPD = 116.034 |
3.95% |
103.946%
|
| 2009 |
2008 IPD = 123.244 | 2007 IPD = 120.613 |
2.18% | 102.18%
|
| 12010 | 2009 IPD = 134.305 |
2008 IPD = 133.627 | 0.51% |
100.51%
|
| 2011 |
2010 IPD = 111.14 |
2009 IPD = 109.664 |
1.35% |
101.35%
|
|
1In 2009, the Bureau of Economic Analysis revised its indexing
and set the baseline index at 100 for the year 2005. Previous implicit price deflators
shown here (2008 through 2004) were based on a baseline index of 100 for the year
2000, (2003 and earlier) were based on a baseline index of 100 for the year 1996.
Information in this table is obtained from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
|
All Closure, Post-Closure, and Corrective Action cost estimates must be updated
annually, either by completing a new cost estimate, or by multiplying the previous
year’s cost estimate by the Inflation Factor. For example:
Sample Calculation
|
| Sum of Closure, Post-Closure and Corrective Action Cost Estimates for Last Year: |
$1,500,000.00
|
| Times the Inflation Factor for this year: |
X 1.0135
|
| Updated Cost Estimate for this year: |
$1,520,250
|